National:
Climate damages fine for polluters

Implement and collect fines from corporations for polluting activities, such as fossil fuel extraction, to help justly and directly finance a shift off of polluting products. The cost of such a fine must not be placed upon people but rather be collected from corporations by governments and publicly governed to serve the people.

What does this look like?

The payment of the fine must not be used to permit or legitimize more pollution to take place, or create dependence on continued pollution as a source of income. Therefore implementation of climate damages fines must be in accordance with the guidelines detailed below.

  • Establish a national climate damages fine for every unit that polluting corporations pollute or extract.

  • Corporations must be legally barred from passing on the cost of the fine to consumers, and they must demonstrate that the payments are coming directly from their net revenues or profits.

  • A climate damages fine should incentivize a reorientation by the polluting and power-producing industries away from fossil fuels or other polluting products by reducing the profits they derive from that activity. This also would make them a less attractive investment option.

  • The fine should only be one option utilized by governments in a suite of complementary financial measures, including others such as the removal of subsidies for fossil fuel or agrochemicals, to make polluting industry business increasingly non-viable.

  • In the same spirit, the use of climate damages fines should reinforce, not replace, a government’s responsibility to mobilize and allocate public finance to address climate change and the subsequent needs of communities. Any governments utilizing such a fine must do so alongside safeguards that ensure the resources raised will serve communities and be protected against corruption.

  • The design of the fine should ensure that it escalates annually, and upon repeated occurrences, making polluting industries’ business increasingly unprofitable year on year and raising billions of dollars annually to address climate impacts while contributing to a phase out of the product (such as fossil fuels) by mid-century.[1]

  • It must be a fine at source (e.g., for fossil fuel corporations a fine on extraction or for agribusiness at the start of the food supply chain) with the cost borne directly by the corporations, not the country where the activity is taking place.

  • Implementation of the fine must include reporting transparently on what is being paid and to whom, making it more difficult for polluters to lobby policymakers and enforcers for preferential rules and prices.

  • Finance received through the collection of such a fine should:

    • Be used only to serve the public interest by addressing climate impacts or funding a just transition. The latter could include activities such as to fund decentralized, community-led renewable energy solutions as well as decentralized food systems, including local farms, that ensure care and restoration of land.

    • In no way be used to directly or indirectly promote fossil fuel or other polluting activities.

    • Directly contribute to the international financing facility for loss and damage and go directly to communities to address climate impacts. Wealthy, industrialized countries should contribute significantly more (at least 50%) of resources gathered through climate damages fines. Similarly, the bulk of resources raised through these fines in lower-income countries enduring the greatest impacts of climate change should go directly to support impacted communities in-country, on a sliding scale basis.

 

 Implementing the measures of the liability roadmap

Decision-makers and movements at all levels should keep the following in mind when implementing the measures laid out in this roadmap:

  • Enacting these policies and measures is simply the first step to holding polluting and destructive industries liable: There will be much work for government officials, decision-makers, activists and civil society alike to do to ensure these measures are fully implemented and move us toward the transformative change the world needs.

  • Liability should be applied to all industries and corporations that make business decisions that contribute to climate change and its impacts, or that cause harm to people and nature. In addition to the fossil fuel industry, these industries include but are not limited to agribusiness, forestry, mining, and the energy sector. 

  • Many of these measures could equally apply to State-owned corporations. Because the national contexts and unique needs vary from country to country, it is worth considering where to apply and how to adapt the principles and measures listed in the liability roadmap to address State-owned polluting corporations. Factors to consider when doing so could include but are not limited to the degree of democratic control over the entity, role and use of funding from oil/gas revenues, and responsiveness of the entity to transition to regenerative, renewable energy sources. 

  • Measures implemented at the national level should support and reinforce, rather than contradict, measures implemented at the sub-national and local, and vice versa.

    back to top

 


  1 "CDT Data Tables," Stamp Out Poverty, accessed August 27, 2020, https://www.stampoutpoverty.org/cdt-data-tables/.